[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <AANLkTik3BGzgO2UB-Yu5Qg+eVj=76cOQoG6g2UBJLjFe@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2011 09:27:35 +0600
From: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Jan Harkes <jaharkes@...cmu.edu>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, coda@...cmu.edu,
codalist@...emann.coda.cs.cmu.edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs, coda: Fix compile warning when CONFIG_SYSCTL=n.
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 4:34 AM, Andrew Morton
<akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Mar 2011 21:48:23 +0600
> Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com> wrote:
>
> These do/while stubs should not have the trailing ";" - adding them
> will cause breakage in some calling scenarios.
>
I missed that, these stubs are not used by anything. I wasn't sure,
who knows, some random config might trigger some more warning. So I
kept it.
> It is much better to implement such stubs in C rather than as macros.
>
I'll remember.
> But these stubs can't be doing anything useful anyway: they appear at
> the end of a .c file which wasn't #included by anything. Therefore:
>
> --- a/fs/coda/sysctl.c~fs-coda-fix-compile-warning-when-config_sysctl=n-fix
> +++ a/fs/coda/sysctl.c
> @@ -61,9 +61,4 @@ void coda_sysctl_clean(void)
> fs_table_header = NULL;
> }
> }
> -#else
> -
> -#define coda_sysctl_init() do { } while (0);
> -#define coda_sysctl_clean() do { } while (0);
> -
> #endif
> _
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists