linux-kernel - Re: [patch 1/2] stop_machine: enable __stop_machine() to be called from the cpu online path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4DEE712F.3080800@zytor.com>
Date:	Tue, 07 Jun 2011 11:42:55 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	"trenn@...ell.com" <trenn@...ell.com>,
	"prarit@...hat.com" <prarit@...hat.com>,
	"tj@...nel.org" <tj@...nel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Song, Youquan" <youquan.song@...el.com>,
	"stable@...nel.org" <stable@...nel.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 1/2] stop_machine: enable __stop_machine() to be called
 from the cpu online path

On 06/07/2011 11:38 AM, Suresh Siddha wrote:
> 
> This is kind of a false positive. We are just checking if the calling
> cpu is online/offline (and there is no possible process migration
> between an online and offline cpu).
> 

Is the state not available in a percpu variable of some sort?  If not,
shouldn't it be rather than indirecting via a CPU number?

	-hpa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/