[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1307472243.9218.10.camel@gandalf.stny.rr.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2011 14:44:03 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: David Daney <ddaney@...iumnetworks.com>
Cc: David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] kprobes/trace: Fix kprobe selftest for gcc 4.6
On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 11:22 -0700, David Daney wrote:
> On 06/07/2011 11:12 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Tue, 2011-06-07 at 11:08 -0700, David Daney wrote:
> >
> >>> -static int kprobe_trace_selftest_target(int a1, int a2, int a3,
> >>> - int a4, int a5, int a6)
> >>> +/*
> >>> + * Can't be static, otherwise gcc might optimize this to
> >>> + * not be in the kallsyms table.
> >>> + */
> >>
> >> Could you make it '__used' instead?
> >>
> >
> > I can try, but the problem is not that the function itself is being
> > optimized out. It looks like its being turned into anonymous text. That
> > is, it optimized out the symbol name, not the code itself.
> >
>
> Really it is no big deal either way. Just a thought I had.
This actually works! I like it better.
Ingo, can you hold off on pulling, while I rebase to do it David's way?
I can add tested-by tags and fix misspellings of my other change logs as
well.
Thanks!
-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists