lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Sun, 12 Jun 2011 12:34:20 -0700
From:	"Justin P. Mattock" <justinmattock@...il.com>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
CC:	linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH]drivers:base:power:trace.c Add "UTC" Coordinated Universal
 Time to the printk.

On 06/12/2011 11:35 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, June 12, 2011, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>> On 06/12/2011 05:12 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> On Thursday, June 09, 2011, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>>>> From: "Justin P. Mattock"<justinmattock@...il.com>
>>>>
>>>> sounds stupid, but taking a glance at the time, and seeing the wrong time, or what seemed
>>>> wrong in dmesg, caused me to go into total check the time clock panic mode.. So the patch below adds:
>>>> "UTC" Coordinated Universal Time abreviation to the printk so people like me dont flip out over the time!
>>>>
>>>> before:
>>>> [    0.114915] Time:  1:47:03  Date: 06/09/11
>>>>
>>>> after:
>>>> [    0.114728] Time:  5:46:02 UTC Date: 06/09/11
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@...il.com>
>>>
>>> I suspect the goal is to mark messages printed by the PM trace code so that
>>> they can be easily distinguished from messages from other sources to avoid
>>> confusion.  Why do you think it's a good idea to use the "UTC" string for
>>> this purpose?  The time printed in those messages need not be UTC.
>>>
>>> It would be better to simply print "RTC time: ..., date: ..." IMO.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Rafael
>>>
>>
>> well.. if thats better, then thats better.. over here(people that dont
>> know what RTC time is) would not get so confused with a simple UTC or
>> PDT or whatever the time zone is but if RTC is bettr, then its better.
>
> My point is we don't know this time is always UTC, so we rather shouldn't
> label it as UTC unconditionally, should we?
>
> Rafael
>

sounds good to me!!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ