[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <58E25CAF-EAC4-4613-81B2-D713F5DC8CEF@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:19:19 -0700
From: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <thebigcorporation@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Andrew Chew <achew@...dia.com>,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jkastner@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rtc-tegra: properly initialize spinlock
On Jul 22, 2011, at 3:13 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 22 Jul 2011 10:35:56 +0200
> Uwe Kleine-K__nig <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>
>> Using __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED for a dynamically allocated lock is wrong and
>> breaks with PREEMPT_RT_FULL.
>
> Please define "breaks". Lockdep warnings? Deadlocks?
Narrr, I think its a compile-time problem with the static initializer.
Sven
>
>> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-tegra.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-tegra.c
>> index 2fc31aa..75259fe 100644
>> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-tegra.c
>> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-tegra.c
>> @@ -343,7 +343,7 @@ static int __devinit tegra_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> /* set context info. */
>> info->pdev = pdev;
>> - info->tegra_rtc_lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(info->tegra_rtc_lock);
>> + spin_lock_init(&info->tegra_rtc_lock);
>>
>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, info);
>>
>> --
>> 1.7.5.4
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-rt-users" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists