[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4E2E4FF1.1010103@fusionio.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 07:26:09 +0200
From: Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: block: BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [00000000]
code
On 2011-07-26 06:49, Ming Lei wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The bug is observed in -next-20110725, follows the stack trace[1], and
> seems the attachment patch can fix the bug.
Does this work, too? We don't necessarily need the CPU stable, but
spewing debug output isn't very nice.
diff --git a/block/blk-core.c b/block/blk-core.c
index f8cb099..f925581 100644
--- a/block/blk-core.c
+++ b/block/blk-core.c
@@ -1283,7 +1283,7 @@ get_rq:
if (test_bit(QUEUE_FLAG_SAME_COMP, &q->queue_flags) ||
bio_flagged(bio, BIO_CPU_AFFINE))
- req->cpu = smp_processor_id();
+ req->cpu = raw_smp_processor_id();
plug = current->plug;
if (plug) {
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists