linux-kernel - Re: [x86] Fix prefetch instruction

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 05 Aug 2011 13:13:37 -0700
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [x86] Fix prefetch instruction

On 08/05/2011 09:18 AM, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> The prefetchnta instruction used for prefetching on x86 is a special instruction
> used for streaming that is usually used to avoid polluting the l2 and l3 caches.
> The cacheline will be evicted rapidly.
> 
> What we need is a prefetch that puts the cacheline in all levels of the cache hierachy instead.
> Change the instruction to do that.
> 
> Acked-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> 

Have you done any performance analysis on this versus the null case?  I
know there are some workloads where it helps, but if it hurts as many as
it helps...

	-hpa

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/