linux-kernel - Re: [Bug #39342] [3.0.0-rc6-git7] possible recursive locking atcache_alloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 22 Aug 2011 10:54:22 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Cc:	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>, rjw@...k.pl,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-testers@...r.kernel.org,
	maciej.rutecki@...il.com, florian@...kler.org
Subject: Re: [Bug #39342] [3.0.0-rc6-git7] possible recursive locking
 atcache_alloc_refill

On Mon, 2011-08-15 at 08:46 +0300, Pekka Enberg wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 1:36 AM, Tetsuo Handa
> <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
> > Pekka Enberg wrote:
> >> Tetsuio, did Peter's commit 30765b9 ("slab, lockdep: Annotate the locks
> >> before using them") and commit 83835b3 ("slab, lockdep: Annotate slab ->
> >> rcu -> debug_object -> slab") in Linus' git fix this for you?
> >
> > Yes. Applying these two commits fixes this problem.
> >
> > Thank you.
> 
> The commits weren't tagged for -stable, I'm afraid. Peter?

I must have forgotten people were actually triggering this on 3.0. Feel
free to tell gregkh to include those two patches in his next 3.0-stable
lineup.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/