[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20110823105727.GA29209@local>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 12:57:42 +0200
From: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...sjkoch.de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>,
"Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...sjkoch.de>,
Chris Wright <chrisw@...hat.com>,
Anthony Foiani <anthony.foiani@...il.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH] uio/gen-pci: don't enable interrupts in ISR
On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:40:05AM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> * Greg KH | 2011-08-22 17:49:43 [-0700]:
>
> >> > Cc: Anthony Foiani <anthony.foiani@...il.com>
> >
> >Why, it's not fixing a bug that anyone hits, right?
>
> "earlier" the interrupt handler was executed either with interrupts
> enabled or disabled if IRQF_DISABLED was specified. Later the latter
> become default even if IRQF_DISABLED was not specified. This lead to the
> splat Anthony reported because the irq handler was entered with IRQs
> disabled and the ISR enabled them via spin_unlock_irq(). My initial
> patch simply used spin_unlock_irqrestore() (and its counterpart) to have
> the same state as we had.
>
> So the bug Anthony hit was that the interrupts were enabled where they
> should not be.
>
> >greg k-h
>
> Sebastian
>
Greg, I'll change the commit message so that it becomes clear, and send
you a pull request.
There is also one more UIO patch pending. Do you want a separate branch
for -stable, or can you cherry-pick that from one UIO branch?
Thanks,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists