[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAF+7xWkQ6SX9aUjBuaCgNVwKoiaBoV6gXfOYfw3MBf9B2c_wiA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Sep 2011 07:45:29 +0800
From: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
To: Richard Purdie <richard.purdie@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm00@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] backlight: Rename corgibl_limit_intensity to genericbl_limit_intensity
>> Why does corgibl_limit_intensity/genericbl_limit_intensity exist?
>> Nothing in the tree references it?
>
> It sounds like someone has removed the sharpsl battery driver which did
> use this. If this hook isn't used, low battery with high screen
> backlight values will reset the device as the wiring isn't up to the
> current draw.
>
It is removed by commit 13a542475d1c62a12c77abfa83a790245598fc61
Author: Christoph Egger <siccegge@...fau.de>
Date: Sun Jul 4 23:24:52 2010 +0800
[ARM] pxa: removing dead BACKLIGHT_CORGI
BACKLIGHT_CORGI was later renamed to BACKLIGHT_GENERIC and has not been
used since then. As it's now safe to completely transition to LCD_CORGI
driver, which incorprates both the LCD and backlight device.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Egger <siccegge@...fau.de>
Signed-off-by: Eric Miao <eric.y.miao@...il.com>
So, should we remove corgibl_limit_intensity/genericbl_limit_intensity
since now it is not being used?
> Richard
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists