[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8DC664164FA4D1449479E7B36CDCFB1F221F060A92@GVW0676EXC.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2011 17:52:31 +0100
From: "Oberman, Laurence (HAS GSE)" <Laurence.Oberman@...com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: "Seger, Mark" <mark.seger@...com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Cabaniols, Sebastien" <Sebastien.Cabaniols@...com>
Subject: RE: Regression in reading /proc/stat in the newer kernels with
large SMP and NUMA configurations
Standard RHEL kernel build.
What the customer would be using.
[root@...uxbeast boot]# cat config-2.6.32-131.6.1.el6.x86_64 | grep NR
CONFIG_NR_CPUS=4096
-----Original Message-----
From: Eric Dumazet [mailto:eric.dumazet@...il.com]
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 12:40 PM
To: Oberman, Laurence (HAS GSE)
Cc: Seger, Mark; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Cabaniols, Sebastien
Subject: RE: Regression in reading /proc/stat in the newer kernels with large SMP and NUMA configurations
Le vendredi 14 octobre 2011 à 17:27 +0100, Oberman, Laurence (HAS GSE) a
écrit :
> Eric,
>
> Got the system ready and ran the tests.
>
> This is a DL980 128 CPCUS, 256GB memory.
>
> [root@...uxbeast ~]# cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep processor | wc -l
> 128
>
> [root@...uxbeast ~]# uname -a
> Linux linuxbeast.gse.mvlabs.corp.hp.com 2.6.32-131.6.1.el6.x86_64 #1 SMP Mon Jun 20 14:15:38 EDT 2011 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
>
> In this example we take >4ms per read. We are spending most of the time in
>
> 35.09% t [kernel.kallsyms] [k] kstat_irqs_cpu
> 32.13% t [kernel.kallsyms] [k] find_next_bit
> 24.32% t [kernel.kallsyms] [k] show_stat
> 1.98% t [kernel.kallsyms] [k] vsnprintf
> 1.63% t [kernel.kallsyms] [k] format_decode
> 1.23% t [kernel.kallsyms] [k] number
Hmm, have you compiled your kernel with NR_CPUS=4096 ???
Powered by blists - more mailing lists