[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EEEA3D0.9070703@oss.ntt.co.jp>
Date: Mon, 19 Dec 2011 11:39:12 +0900
From: Takuya Yoshikawa <yoshikawa.takuya@....ntt.co.jp>
To: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
CC: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>, Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KVM <kvm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/8] KVM: MMU: do not add a nonpresent spte to rmaps of
its child
(2011/12/16 19:15), Xiao Guangrong wrote:
> -static void mmu_page_add_parent_pte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> - struct kvm_mmu_page *sp, u64 *parent_pte)
> +static void mmu_page_add_set_parent_pte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
> + struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
> + u64 *parent_pte)
> {
> if (!parent_pte)
> return;
>
> + mmu_spte_set(parent_pte, __pa(sp->spt) | SHADOW_PAGE_TABLE);
> pte_list_add(vcpu, parent_pte,&sp->parent_ptes);
> }
There are a few prefixes in the kvm mmu code.
e.g. mmu_page_, kvm_mmu_, kvm_mmu_page_, ...
Sometimes we also use "sp".
How about deciding a consistent way from now on?
E.g.
if the function is static and for local use only, such a prefix
can be eliminated,
if it is used outside of mmu.c, kvm_mmu_ is needed,
we use sp for kvm_mmu_page,
...
(just an example)
Takuya
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists