linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] vmalloc: remove #ifdef in function body

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1324447099.21340.6.camel@joe2Laptop>
Date:	Tue, 20 Dec 2011 21:58:19 -0800
From:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To:	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] vmalloc: remove #ifdef in function body

On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 14:45 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 09:31:21PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 14:17 +0900, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > > We don't like function body which include #ifdef.
[]
> > I don't like this change.
> > I think it's perfectly good style to use:
> I feel it's no problem as it is because it's very short function now
> but it's not style we prefer. 

Who is this "we" you refer to?

There's nothing suggesting your patch as a preferred style
in Documentation/CodingStyle.

cheers, Joe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/