lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 17 Feb 2012 16:15:08 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	Kautuk Consul <consul.kautuk@...il.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] rmap: Staticize page_referenced_file and
 page_referenced_anon

On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 09:27 -0500, Kautuk Consul wrote:
> Staticize the page_referenced_anon and page_referenced_file
> functions.
> These functions are called only from page_referenced.

Subject and changelog say: staticize, which I read to mean: make static.
Yet what the patch does is make them inline ?!?

Also, if they're static and there's only a single callsite, gcc will
already inline them, does this patch really make a difference?

> -static int page_referenced_anon(struct page *page,
> +static inline int page_referenced_anon(struct page *page,


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ