linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Check for quoted strings broken across lines

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120321060544.GA2831@leaf>
Date:	Tue, 20 Mar 2012 23:05:44 -0700
From:	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Check for quoted strings broken across lines

On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 09:35:58PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 21:28 -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> > The heuristics in the patch I submitted almost completely eliminate
> > false positives, which makes my patch suitable for use without --strict.
> 
> Yup, this patch is better than the one I submitted.

OK.  Andrew, could you substitute my patch for Joe's in your tree?

> One improvement might be to check for a line continuation \
> on $prevline and still produce a warning in that case.

I'd suggest doing that one as a separate check, "unnecessary line
continuation", which should flag any use of a line continuation other
than with a preprocessor directive.  I don't think combining that with
the wrapped-string check makes sense.

- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/