linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] hugetlb: fix race condition in hugetlb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20120406162618.3307a9bd.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date:	Fri, 6 Apr 2012 16:26:18 -0700
From:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To:	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc:	Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
	Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] hugetlb: fix race condition in hugetlb_fault()

On Fri, 6 Apr 2012 16:10:13 -0700 (PDT)
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:

> On Fri, 6 Apr 2012, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Sun, 1 Apr 2012 12:51:49 -0400
> > Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > >> Cc: stable@...nel.org
> > > > Let Andrew do the stable work, ok?
> > > 
> > > Fair point.  I'm used to adding the Cc myself for things I push through the
> > > arch/tile tree.  This of course does make more sense to go through Andrew,
> > > so I'll remove it.
> > 
> > No, please do add the stable tag if you think it is needed.  And ensure
> > that the changelog explains why a backport is needed, by describing
> > the user-visible effects of the bug.
> > 
> > Tree-owners regularly forget to wonder if a patch should be backported
> > and we end up failing to backport patches which should have been
> > backported.  If we have more people flagging backport patches, fewer
> > patches will fall through the cracks.
> 
> The resulting patch is okay; but let's reassure Chris that his
> original patch was better, before he conceded to make the get_page
> and put_page unconditional, and added unnecessary detail of the race.
> 

Yes, the v1 patch was better.  No reason was given for changing it?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/