[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201204161414.14624.arnd@arndb.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 14:14:14 +0000
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kevin.wells@....com,
srinivas.bakki@....com, stern@...land.harvard.edu,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] USB: Add driver for NXP ISP1301 USB transceiver
On Monday 16 April 2012, Roland Stigge wrote:
> This very-lowlevel driver registers the NXP ISP1301 chip via the I2C subsystem.
> The chip is the USB transceiver shared by ohci-nxp, lpc32xx_udc (gadget) and
> isp1301_omap.
>
> Following patches let the respective USB host and gadget drivers use this
> driver, instead of duplicating ISP1301 handling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roland Stigge <stigge@...com.de>
All three patches:
Acked-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
> This driver needs to be probe()d before the respective USB driver using it. For
> modules, this is handled via the module dependency. When linking statically, it
> is done via linking order in the Makefile (misc/ before host/ and the gadget/).
You can easily avoid the link order restriction now by returning -EPROBE_DEFER
from the probe function of the device that needs this one.
> Currently, only one ISP1301 chip is supported. To support multiple instances,
> we would need a mechanism to identify the respective chips via DT (and static
> resources or platform data) to be referenced by the higher level USB driver at
> isp1301_get_client(). Any suggestions?
Put a phandle into the usb device node, like:
isp1301: usb-transceiver@23 {
compatible = "nxp,isp1301";
reg = <23>;
};
usbd@...20000 {
compatible = "nxp,lpc32xx-udc";
reg = <0x31020000 0x300>;
interrupt-parent = <&mic>;
interrupts = <0x3d 0>, <0x3e 0>, <0x3c 0>, <0x3a 0>;
transceiver = <&isp1301>;
status = "disable";
};
Then add a device_node argument to the isp1301_get_client() function
and change the function to use bus_find_device() with a match function
that compares the driver pointer.
Alternatively (and much more complex), you could add a generic usb-transceiver
abstraction that does this and also hides the register accesses behind
hardware independent function calls.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists