[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.WNT.2.00.1205171702590.7900@jbrandeb-mobl2.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 17:04:04 -0700 (Pacific Daylight Time)
From: "Brandeburg, Jesse" <jesse.brandeburg@...el.com>
To: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@...-lyon.org>
cc: "Dave, Tushar N" <tushar.n.dave@...el.com>,
"Kirsher, Jeffrey T" <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>,
"Allan, Bruce W" <bruce.w.allan@...el.com>,
"Wyborny, Carolyn" <carolyn.wyborny@...el.com>,
"Skidmore, Donald C" <donald.c.skidmore@...el.com>,
"Rose, Gregory V" <gregory.v.rose@...el.com>,
"Waskiewicz Jr, Peter P" <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@...el.com>,
"Duyck, Alexander H" <alexander.h.duyck@...el.com>,
"Ronciak, John" <john.ronciak@...el.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jiri Pirko <jpirko@...hat.com>,
Dean Nelson <dnelson@...hat.com>,
"e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<e1000-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] e1000: Reset rx ring index on receive overrun
On Thu, 17 May 2012, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Samuel Thibault, le Fri 18 May 2012 01:28:21 +0200, a écrit :
> > Dave, Tushar N, le Thu 17 May 2012 23:22:31 +0000, a écrit :
> > > I am interested in to see if you have actual test case and more
> > > importantly test data that shows that kernel and device indexes are
> > > not synchronized any more.
> >
> > Well, it's not with an actual physical device, but with the kvm
> > emulation.
>
> BTW, it also happens easily when request_irq takes some time to
> complete: since we enable E1000_TCTL_EN before that, the card can have
> time to fill the ring before irqs are processed.
I think there may well be a bug in the implementation in kvm. The
hardware doesn't have this bug.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists