[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ADE657CA350FB648AAC2C43247A983F0020698DBC78B@AUSP01VMBX24.collaborationhost.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Jun 2012 15:20:32 -0500
From: H Hartley Sweeten <hartleys@...ionengravers.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
CC: Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"fmhess@...rs.sourceforge.net" <fmhess@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
"abbotti@....co.uk" <abbotti@....co.uk>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 8/8] staging: comedi: cleanup comedi_alloc_subdevices
On Tuesday, June 12, 2012 12:50 PM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:59:55AM -0700, H Hartley Sweeten wrote:
>> for (i = 0; i < num_subdevices; ++i) {
>> - dev->subdevices[i].device = dev;
>> - dev->subdevices[i].async_dma_dir = DMA_NONE;
>> - spin_lock_init(&dev->subdevices[i].spin_lock);
>> - dev->subdevices[i].minor = -1;
>> + s = dev->subdevices + i;
>
> You don't have to resend, but I think this would look better as:
>
> s = &dev->subdevices[i];
I don't disagree but the "dev->subdevices +i" format is consistently
used in all the comedi stuff. If the format above is preferred we
should probably update everything,
>> + s->device = dev;
>> + s->async_dma_dir = DMA_NONE;
>> + spin_lock_init(&s->spin_lock);
>> + s->minor = -1;
>> }
>
> Btw, this patchset is great. Nice.
Thanks!
Hartley
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists