[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1340078223.6871.5.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 19 Jun 2012 04:57:03 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: "Grumbach, Emmanuel" <emmanuel.grumbach@...el.com>
Cc: Herton Ronaldo Krzesinski <herton.krzesinski@...onical.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk" <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"Berg, Johannes" <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>
Subject: RE: [ 39/69] iwlwifi: disable the buggy chain extension feature in
HW
On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 19:23 +0000, Grumbach, Emmanuel wrote:
> > Hi, this triggers the following build warning:
> > linux-stable/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-trans-pcie.c: In function
> > 'iwl_trans_pcie_tx_start':
> > linux-stable/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-trans-pcie.c:874:2: warning:
> > passing argument 1 of 'iwl_write_prph' from incompatible pointer type
> > [enabled by default]
> > linux-stable/drivers/net/wireless/iwlwifi/iwl-io.h:72:6: note: expected 'struct
> > iwl_bus *' but argument is of type 'struct iwl_trans *'
> >
> > For 3.2, it should be passed as bus(trans) as other invocations.
> >
> > > /* Enable DMA channel */
> > > for (chan = 0; chan < FH_TCSR_CHNL_NUM ; chan++)
> > > iwl_write_direct32(bus(trans),
> > FH_TCSR_CHNL_TX_CONFIG_REG(chan),
>
> Correct
Thanks both, I'll fix this up. No idea how I missed that warning.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
If more than one person is responsible for a bug, no one is at fault.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists