[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1340807344.1207.207.camel@bling.home>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:29:04 -0600
From: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
To: Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
Cc: avi@...hat.com, mst@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jan.kiszka@...mens.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/6] kvm: KVM_EOIFD, an eventfd for EOIs
On Wed, 2012-06-27 at 16:58 +0300, Gleb Natapov wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 11:10:08PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > This new ioctl enables an eventfd to be triggered when an EOI is
> > written for a specified irqchip pin. By default this is a simple
> > notification, but we can also tie the eoifd to a level irqfd, which
> > enables the irqchip pin to be automatically de-asserted on EOI.
> > This mode is particularly useful for device-assignment applications
> > where the unmask and notify triggers a hardware unmask. The default
> > mode is most applicable to simple notify with no side-effects for
> > userspace usage, such as Qemu.
> >
> > Here we make use of the reference counting of the _irq_source
> > object allowing us to share it with an irqfd and cleanup regardless
> > of the release order.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
> > ---
> >
> > Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt | 24 +++++
> > arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 1
> > include/linux/kvm.h | 14 +++
> > include/linux/kvm_host.h | 13 +++
> > virt/kvm/eventfd.c | 189 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > virt/kvm/kvm_main.c | 11 ++
> > 6 files changed, 250 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> > index b216709..87a2558 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> > +++ b/Documentation/virtual/kvm/api.txt
> > @@ -1987,6 +1987,30 @@ interrupts with those injected through KVM_IRQ_LINE. IRQFDs created
> > with KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_LEVEL must also set this flag when de-assiging.
> > KVM_IRQFD_FLAG_LEVEL support is indicated by KVM_CAP_IRQFD_LEVEL.
> >
> > +4.77 KVM_EOIFD
> > +
> > +Capability: KVM_CAP_EOIFD
> > +Architectures: x86
> > +Type: vm ioctl
> > +Parameters: struct kvm_eoifd (in)
> > +Returns: 0 on success, -1 on error
> > +
> > +KVM_EOIFD allows userspace to receive EOI notification through an
> > +eventfd for level triggered irqchip interrupts. Behavior for edge
> > +triggered interrupts is undefined. kvm_eoifd.fd specifies the eventfd
> Lets make it defined. EOI notification can be used by userspace to fix
> time drift due to lost interrupts. But than userspace needs to know
> which vcpu did EOI.
Hmm, do we need an additional flag and field in kvm_eoifd to filter by
vCPU then?
> Also see question below.
>
...
> > +
> > +static int kvm_assign_eoifd(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_eoifd *args)
> > +{
> > + struct eventfd_ctx *eventfd;
> > + struct _eoifd *eoifd, *tmp;
> > + struct _irq_source *source = NULL;
> > +
> > + if (args->flags & KVM_EOIFD_FLAG_LEVEL_IRQFD) {
> > + source = get_irq_source_from_irqfd(kvm, args->irqfd);
> > + if (IS_ERR(source))
> > + return PTR_ERR(source);
> > + }
> > +
> Shouldn't you check that eoifd->gsi == irqfd->gsi?
Yes I should. Thanks,
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists