[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120627162430.3477d0f6@BR9GNB5Z>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 16:24:30 +0200
From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
To: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
Cc: avi@...hat.com, mst@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, jan.kiszka@...mens.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] kvm: Pass kvm_irqfd to functions
On Tue, 26 Jun 2012 23:09:04 -0600
Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com> wrote:
> Prune this down to just the struct kvm_irqfd so we can avoid
> changing function definition for every flag or field we use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alex Williamson <alex.williamson@...hat.com>
I'm currently trying to find a way to make irqfd workable for s390
which will likely include using a new field in kvm_irqfd, so I'd like
to have this change (and I also think it makes the code nicer to read).
So:
Acked-by: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists