[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5001EFCC.4070908@jonmasters.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2012 18:16:44 -0400
From: Jon Masters <jonathan@...masters.org>
To: Alexander Holler <holler@...oftware.de>
CC: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/36] AArch64 Linux kernel port
On 07/10/2012 04:16 PM, Alexander Holler wrote:
> And it isn't so that the name will have to be used that seldom, at least
> every distribution would need to use it to name the flavour, like e.g.
> "Fedora AArch64hf" or "Debian AArch64".
The good news is we won't need an "hf" release because we're all going
to just agree on the ABI on day one, and standardize the paths, and all
the distros are going to live happily ever after[0].
Jon.
[0] The first part at least is actually true. There is an ABI that I
reviewed a long time back (you can download it), and we assume the
presence of all kinds of previously optional stuff...like the fp.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists