[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5044665C.5020909@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Sep 2012 16:12:12 +0800
From: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
To: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
x86@...nel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
CC: len.brown@...el.com, pavel@....cz, rjw@...k.pl, tglx@...utronix.de,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
rusty@...tcorp.com.au, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.c>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] numa: don't check if node is NUMA_NO_NODE
If we don't debug per_cpu maps, the cpu's node is stored in per_cpu variable
numa_node. If node is NUMA_NO_NODE, it means the caller want to clear the
cpu's node. So we should also call set_cpu_numa_node() in this case.
Signed-off-by: Wen Congyang <wency@...fujitsu.com>
---
arch/x86/mm/numa.c | 3 +--
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
index 2d125be..21d02f0 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/numa.c
@@ -97,8 +97,7 @@ void __cpuinit numa_set_node(int cpu, int node)
#endif
per_cpu(x86_cpu_to_node_map, cpu) = node;
- if (node != NUMA_NO_NODE)
- set_cpu_numa_node(cpu, node);
+ set_cpu_numa_node(cpu, node);
}
void __cpuinit numa_clear_node(int cpu)
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists