[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20121023133527.GA16230@one.firstfloor.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Oct 2012 15:35:27 +0200
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, acme@...hat.com, eranian@...gle.com,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, avi@...hat.com,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/34] perf, kvm: Support the intx/intx_cp modifiers in KVM arch perfmon emulation v2
> So I forgot how all this worked, but will the KVM emulation not pass
> this straight down to the hardware?
Pass down to perf.
>
> Don't we have a problem where we're emulating arch perfmon v1 on AMD
> hardware? On AMD hardware those bits do have meaning.
Ah they do? I wasn't aware. I can add a cpuid check for Intel I suppose.
-andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists