[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <D854C92F57B1B347B57E531E78D05EAD24510D25@BGSMSX102.gar.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2012 14:28:03 +0000
From: "Pallala, Ramakrishna" <ramakrishna.pallala@...el.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "Anton Vorontsov (cbouatmailru@...il.com)" <cbouatmailru@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH RESEND] max17042: missing assignment
Thanks Alan.
> The second error check is unreachable because the lock function isn't assigned
> to ret
>
> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@...ux.intel.com>
Acked-by: Ramakrishna Pallala <ramakrishna.pallala@...el.com>
> ---
>
> drivers/power/max17042_battery.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/power/max17042_battery.c
> b/drivers/power/max17042_battery.c
> index 74abc6c..73b432d 100644
> --- a/drivers/power/max17042_battery.c
> +++ b/drivers/power/max17042_battery.c
> @@ -572,7 +572,7 @@ static int max17042_init_chip(struct max17042_chip
> *chip)
> __func__);
> return -EIO;
> }
> - max17042_verify_model_lock(chip);
> + ret = max17042_verify_model_lock(chip);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(&chip->client->dev, "%s lock verify failed\n",
> __func__);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists