[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50BDF925.3090700@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 18:52:45 +0530
From: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To: Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.csengg@...il.com>
CC: LAK <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
DLOS <davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
Manjunath Hadli <manjunath.hadli@...com>,
Prabhakar Lad <prabhakar.lad@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/2] ARM: davinci: dm365 EVM: add support for VPBE
display
On 12/3/2012 1:51 PM, Prabhakar Lad wrote:
> From: Manjunath Hadli <manjunath.hadli@...com>
>
> add support for V4L2 video display to DM365 EVM.
> Support for SD and ED modes is provided, along with Composite
> and Component outputs.
>
> Signed-off-by: Manjunath Hadli <manjunath.hadli@...com>
> Signed-off-by: Lad, Prabhakar <prabhakar.lad@...com>
> ---
> arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm365-evm.c | 177 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> 1 files changed, 176 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm365-evm.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm365-evm.c
> index 0c3dae6..10f2a85 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm365-evm.c
> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-dm365-evm.c
> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
> #include <linux/input.h>
> #include <linux/spi/spi.h>
> #include <linux/spi/eeprom.h>
> +#include <linux/v4l2-dv-timings.h>
>
> #include <asm/mach-types.h>
> #include <asm/mach/arch.h>
> @@ -374,6 +375,180 @@ static struct vpfe_config vpfe_cfg = {
> .ccdc = "ISIF",
> };
>
> +/* venc standards timings */
> +static struct vpbe_enc_mode_info dm365evm_enc_std_timing[] = {
> + {
> + .name = "ntsc",
> + .timings_type = VPBE_ENC_STD,
> + .std_id = V4L2_STD_525_60,
> + .interlaced = 1,
> + .xres = 720,
> + .yres = 480,
> + .aspect = {11, 10},
> + .fps = {30000, 1001},
> + .left_margin = 0x79,
> + .right_margin = 0,
> + .upper_margin = 0x10,
> + .lower_margin = 0,
> + .hsync_len = 0,
> + .vsync_len = 0,
> + .flags = 0,
I wonder what makes this entire information board specific? Shouldn't
these (or at least most of these) be same across all devices which
support NTSC and hence should be coming from some common code instead of
being replicated for each platform that supports NTSC?
Thanks,
Sekhar
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists