| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130116084459.GB13446@lge.com> Date: Wed, 16 Jan 2013 17:45:00 +0900 From: Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com> To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> Cc: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] slub: correct bootstrap() for kmem_cache, kmem_cache_node On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 03:36:10PM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote: > On Tue, 15 Jan 2013, Joonsoo Kim wrote: > > > These didn't make any error previously, because we normally don't free > > objects which comes from kmem_cache's first slab and kmem_cache_node's. > > And these slabs are on the partial list because the objects are typically > relatively small compared to page size. Do you have a system with a very > large kmem_cache size? These slabs are not on the partial list, but on the cpu_slab of boot cpu. Reason for this is described in changelog. Because these slabs are not on partial list, we need to check kmem_cache_cpu's cpu slab. This patch implement it. > > Problem will be solved if we consider a cpu slab in bootstrap(). > > This patch implement it. > > At boot time only one processor is up so you do not need the loop over all > processors. Okay! I will fix and submit v2, soon. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists