| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130201150302.GN30577@one.firstfloor.org> Date: Fri, 1 Feb 2013 16:03:02 +0100 From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, acme@...hat.com, eranian@...gle.com, jolsa@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/12] perf, x86: Support the TSX intx/intx_cp qualifiers v3 > > As requested before, please keep those in a completely separate > series so that minimal support can be merged upstream. This is Hi Ingo, The goal is not to merge "minimal support" but full support. All of these features have users. But I subsetted it to make reviewing easier. I think the initial 10 patch series is reasonable as a first step, quickly followed by the others. Can you handle it or not? Please be clear on that. If you can't handle it I'll consider alternatives. To be honest I find it hard to believe you really have trouble reviewing those 10 straight forward patches (which have already reviewed by others anyways). There's nothing particularly complicated or risky in any of them, and you're a experienced kernel code reviewer. -Andi -- ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists