[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1360268386.27863.2.camel@joe-AO722>
Date: Thu, 07 Feb 2013 12:19:46 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Tim Gardner <tim.gardner@...onical.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Brett Rudley <brudley@...adcom.com>,
Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>,
"Franky (Zhenhui) Lin" <frankyl@...adcom.com>,
Hante Meuleman <meuleman@...adcom.com>,
"John W. Linville" <linville@...driver.com>,
Seth Forshee <seth.forshee@...onical.com>,
Pieter-Paul Giesberts <pieterpg@...adcom.com>,
Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, brcm80211-dev-list@...adcom.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH wireless-next] brcmsmac: avoid 512 byte stack variable
On Thu, 2013-02-07 at 13:13 -0700, Tim Gardner wrote:
> Dynamically allocate the probe response template which
> avoids potential stack corruption. Observed with smatch:
trivial:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/brcm80211/brcmsmac/main.c
[]
> @@ -7408,9 +7408,16 @@ brcms_c_bss_update_probe_resp(struct brcms_c_info *wlc,
[]
> + prb_resp = kmalloc(BCN_TMPL_LEN, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + if (!prb_resp) {
> + wiphy_err(wlc->wiphy, "wl: %s: failed to alloc %u bytes\n",
> + __func__, BCN_TMPL_LEN);
Please remove the error message.
alloc's don't need specific OOM messages.
The mm subsystem already provides a standardized
message with a dump_stack().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists