lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 9 Apr 2013 10:04:58 +0900
From:	Namjae Jeon <linkinjeon@...il.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:	jaegeuk.kim@...sung.com, linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/7] f2fs: add tracepoints support in f2fs filesystem

2013/4/9, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>:
> On Sat, 2013-04-06 at 14:45 +0900, Namjae Jeon wrote:
>> From: Namjae Jeon <namjae.jeon@...sung.com>
>>
>> Add tracepoints in f2fs filesystem for tracing the filesystem
>> operations for information/debugging purpose if needed. All the
>> tracepoints are clubbed with respect to functionalities.
>>
>> Change Log:
>> v3: Introduced TRACE_EVENT_CONDITION() macro for checking the
>> condition page->mapping inside the trace point function call as
>> per Steve's review comment for the patch
>>
>> v2: Added DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS() macro for combining the similar
>> type of trace function calls which has same type of arguments.
>>
>> v1: Introduced the tracepoint functions in f2fs filesystem.
>>
>> Namjae Jeon (7):
>>   f2fs: add tracepoints for sync & Inode operations
>>   f2fs: add tracepoints for truncate operation
>>   f2fs: add tracepoint for tracing the page i/o operations
>>   f2fs: add tracepoints for GC threads
>>   f2fs: add tracepoints to debug the block allocation & fallocate
>>   f2fs: add tracepoints for write page operations
>>   f2fs: add tracepoints to debug checkpoint request
>>
>
Hi. Steve.
> I have nothing more to add about the tracepoint processing. Looks good.
> Now if the tracepoints give you sufficient data? That's up to the
> maintainers to decide.
Until now, yes. but I will continously try to update trace point more
if finding additional  needed points after.
Thanks for review and your ack.

>
> Acked-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
>
> -- Steve
>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists