lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:44:52 +0000
From:	"Li, Fei" <>
To:	Ingo Molnar <>
CC:	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>, "" <>,
	"Liu, Chuansheng" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>,
	"" <>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] x86: eliminate irq_mis_count counted in arch_irq_stat

> > Signed-off-by: Liu Chuansheng <>
> > Signed-off-by: Li Fei <>
> The patch looks good, but this is not a valid signoff sequence. If Liu
> Chuansheng wrote this patch then his From: line should be included. If he
> acked it, then it should be added as Acked-by.
Hello Ingo,
   Thanks for your quick feedback. 

   I add Chuansheng's signature basing on:
   1> Chuansheng found such hole in code;
   2> After discussion with Chuansheng, I wrote the patch;
   3> Chuansheng also acked it.
   Do you think it's OK to add Chuansheng's signature in such case?
   Or better suggestion?

Thanks in advance!

> Thanks,
> 	Ingo
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists