[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BEC9F67575FA1E429CA7CF5AE9BE3634433D23@SHSMSX102.ccr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2013 08:44:52 +0000
From: "Li, Fei" <fei.li@...el.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CC: "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>, "x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"Liu, Chuansheng" <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>,
"tomoki.sekiyama.qu@...achi.com" <tomoki.sekiyama.qu@...achi.com>,
"suresh.b.siddha@...el.com" <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
"joe@...ches.com" <joe@...ches.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] x86: eliminate irq_mis_count counted in arch_irq_stat
> > Signed-off-by: Liu Chuansheng <chuansheng.liu@...el.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Li Fei <fei.li@...el.com>
>
> The patch looks good, but this is not a valid signoff sequence. If Liu
> Chuansheng wrote this patch then his From: line should be included. If he
> acked it, then it should be added as Acked-by.
>
Hello Ingo,
Thanks for your quick feedback.
I add Chuansheng's signature basing on:
1> Chuansheng found such hole in code;
2> After discussion with Chuansheng, I wrote the patch;
3> Chuansheng also acked it.
Do you think it's OK to add Chuansheng's signature in such case?
Or better suggestion?
Thanks in advance!
Fei
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists