linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] perf changes for v3.11

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130703075542.GF23916@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Wed, 3 Jul 2013 09:55:42 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...radead.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] perf changes for v3.11

On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 05:50:29PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> >    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git perf-core-for-linus
> >
> > Kernel improvements:
> >
> >  * AMD IOMMU uncore PMU support by Suravee Suthikulpanit001a
> 
> This one prints a really annoying error message if you're not on an
> AMD platform:
> 
> +       if (!amd_iommu_pc_supported()) {
> +               pr_err("perf: amd_iommu PMU not installed. No support!\n");
> +               return -ENODEV;
> +       }
> 
> and you know what? That's not acceptable. It damn well is *not* an
> error to not have an AMD IOMMU.
> 
> It should - at most - be a pr_info(). Maybe nothing at all. "pr_err()"
> is just totally out of line.

Quite; it prints enough stuff when it does find one so I'm all for
scrapping that one print when it doesn't find it.

Sorry for not seeing that; when I initially read that code I thought it was for
the case where the hardware was expected to have the device but we couldn't
find it for some weird reason.

---
Subject: perf, amd: Do not print an error when the device is not present

As Linus said its not an error to not have an AMD IOMMU; esp. when you're not
even running on an AMD platform.

Requested-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_iommu.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_iommu.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_iommu.c
index 0db655e..639d128 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_iommu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd_iommu.c
@@ -491,10 +491,8 @@ static struct perf_amd_iommu __perf_iommu = {
 static __init int amd_iommu_pc_init(void)
 {
 	/* Make sure the IOMMU PC resource is available */
-	if (!amd_iommu_pc_supported()) {
-		pr_err("perf: amd_iommu PMU not installed. No support!\n");
+	if (!amd_iommu_pc_supported())
 		return -ENODEV;
-	}
 
 	_init_perf_amd_iommu(&__perf_iommu, "amd_iommu");
 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/