[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQVMQyhy57MhrkCH7TYqhwgb5tHFjSxhCh8KcN+DNuXE4Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 16:39:32 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
PaX Team <pageexec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] x86: make sure IDT is page aligned
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 3:16 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 07/16/2013 03:13 PM, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>>
>> ok, then should change
>>
>>> +/* No need to be aligned, but done to keep all IDTs defined the same way. */
>>> +gate_desc trace_idt_table[NR_VECTORS] __page_aligned_bss;
>>
>> ==>
>>
>>> +/* Only need to be cacheline aligned, but keep all IDTs defined the same way to be page aligned. */
>>> +gate_desc trace_idt_table[NR_VECTORS] __page_aligned_bss;
>
> It doesn't need to be cacheline aligned, either, to the best of my
> knowledge. The former comment is more correct.
ok. so the old code is just for optimization to keep it cacheline aligned?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists