[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51E6A015.8040705@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 16:45:57 +0300
From: Oleksandr Kozaruk <oleksandr.kozaruk@...com>
To: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
CC: "tony@...mide.com" <tony@...mide.com>,
"benoit.cousson@...aro.org" <benoit.cousson@...aro.org>,
"Nayak, Rajendra" <rnayak@...com>,
"Ujfalusi, Peter" <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
"ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY" <kishon@...com>,
"jic23@....ac.uk" <jic23@....ac.uk>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"ch.naveen@...sung.com" <ch.naveen@...sung.com>,
"poeschel@...onage.de" <poeschel@...onage.de>,
"Kim, Milo" <Milo.Kim@...com>,
"Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T" <balajitk@...com>,
"gg@...mlogic.co.uk" <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] iio: twl6030-gpadc: TWL6030, TWL6032 GPADC driver
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 01:33:53PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
> On 07/15/2013 01:09 PM, Kozaruk, Oleksandr wrote:
> [...]
> >
> >>> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL,
> >>> + twl6030_gpadc_irq_handler,
> >>> + IRQF_ONESHOT, "twl6030_gpadc", gpadc);
> >>
> >> You access memory in the interrupt handler which is freed before
the interrupt
> >> handler is freed.
> > Thanks for pointing this. devm_* will free memory for irq after the
driver
> > is removed and memory for the device is freed. I took me awhile to
understand
> > this. Is there going to be something like devm_iio_device_alloc?
whould it be helpfull?
> >
>
> Yes, I think it certainly makes sense to add a
devm_iio_device_alloc(), care
> to send a patch?
Anything like this? (of course it's not a patch)
struct iio_dev *devm_iio_device_alloc(struct device *dev, int sizeof_priv)
{
struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
size_t alloc_size;
alloc_size = sizeof(struct iio_dev);
if (sizeof_priv) {
alloc_size = ALIGN(alloc_size, IIO_ALIGN);
alloc_size += sizeof_priv;
}
/* ensure 32-byte alignment of whole construct ? */
alloc_size += IIO_ALIGN - 1;
indio_dev = devm_kzalloc(dev, alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
if (indio_dev) {
indio_dev->dev.groups = indio_dev->groups;
indio_dev->dev.type = &iio_device_type;
indio_dev->dev.bus = &iio_bus_type;
device_initialize(&indio_dev->dev);
dev_set_drvdata(&indio_dev->dev, (void *)indio_dev);
mutex_init(&indio_dev->mlock);
mutex_init(&indio_dev->info_exist_lock);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&indio_dev->channel_attr_list);
indio_dev->id = ida_simple_get(&iio_ida, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
if (indio_dev->id < 0) {
/* cannot use a dev_err as the name isn't available */
printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to get id\n");
kfree(dev);
return NULL;
}
dev_set_name(&indio_dev->dev, "iio:device%d", indio_dev->id);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&indio_dev->buffer_list);
}
return indio_dev;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(devm_iio_device_alloc);
Regards,
OK
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists