[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51E6AE72.2060008@metafoo.de>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 16:47:14 +0200
From: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
To: Oleksandr Kozaruk <oleksandr.kozaruk@...com>
CC: "tony@...mide.com" <tony@...mide.com>,
"benoit.cousson@...aro.org" <benoit.cousson@...aro.org>,
"Nayak, Rajendra" <rnayak@...com>,
"Ujfalusi, Peter" <peter.ujfalusi@...com>,
"ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY" <kishon@...com>,
"jic23@....ac.uk" <jic23@....ac.uk>,
"grant.likely@...aro.org" <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"rob.herring@...xeda.com" <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
"ch.naveen@...sung.com" <ch.naveen@...sung.com>,
"poeschel@...onage.de" <poeschel@...onage.de>,
"Kim, Milo" <Milo.Kim@...com>,
"Krishnamoorthy, Balaji T" <balajitk@...com>,
"gg@...mlogic.co.uk" <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-iio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-iio@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org"
<devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] iio: twl6030-gpadc: TWL6030, TWL6032 GPADC driver
On 07/17/2013 03:45 PM, Oleksandr Kozaruk wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 01:33:53PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote:
>> On 07/15/2013 01:09 PM, Kozaruk, Oleksandr wrote:
>> [...]
>> >
>> >>> + ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, irq, NULL,
>> >>> + twl6030_gpadc_irq_handler,
>> >>> + IRQF_ONESHOT, "twl6030_gpadc", gpadc);
>> >>
>> >> You access memory in the interrupt handler which is freed before the
> interrupt
>> >> handler is freed.
>> > Thanks for pointing this. devm_* will free memory for irq after the driver
>> > is removed and memory for the device is freed. I took me awhile to
> understand
>> > this. Is there going to be something like devm_iio_device_alloc? whould
> it be helpfull?
>> >
>>
>> Yes, I think it certainly makes sense to add a devm_iio_device_alloc(), care
>> to send a patch?
>
> Anything like this? (of course it's not a patch)
>
No. I think you can for example use devm_regulator_get() as a template. But
instead of regulator_get() and regulator_put() use iio_device_alloc() and
iio_device_free().
> struct iio_dev *devm_iio_device_alloc(struct device *dev, int sizeof_priv)
> {
> struct iio_dev *indio_dev;
> size_t alloc_size;
>
> alloc_size = sizeof(struct iio_dev);
> if (sizeof_priv) {
> alloc_size = ALIGN(alloc_size, IIO_ALIGN);
> alloc_size += sizeof_priv;
> }
> /* ensure 32-byte alignment of whole construct ? */
> alloc_size += IIO_ALIGN - 1;
>
> indio_dev = devm_kzalloc(dev, alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (indio_dev) {
> indio_dev->dev.groups = indio_dev->groups;
> indio_dev->dev.type = &iio_device_type;
> indio_dev->dev.bus = &iio_bus_type;
> device_initialize(&indio_dev->dev);
> dev_set_drvdata(&indio_dev->dev, (void *)indio_dev);
> mutex_init(&indio_dev->mlock);
> mutex_init(&indio_dev->info_exist_lock);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&indio_dev->channel_attr_list);
>
> indio_dev->id = ida_simple_get(&iio_ida, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (indio_dev->id < 0) {
> /* cannot use a dev_err as the name isn't available */
> printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to get id\n");
> kfree(dev);
> return NULL;
> }
> dev_set_name(&indio_dev->dev, "iio:device%d", indio_dev->id);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&indio_dev->buffer_list);
> }
>
> return indio_dev;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(devm_iio_device_alloc);
>
> Regards,
> OK
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists