[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51E98663.2040308@cogentembedded.com>
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 22:33:07 +0400
From: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
CC: George Cherian <george.cherian@...com>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
balbi@...com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
kishon@...com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] arm: dts: Add USB phy nodes for AM33XX
Hello.
On 07/19/2013 06:20 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi
>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi
>>> index 8e1248f..e3890c4 100644
>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi
>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi
>>> @@ -326,21 +326,59 @@
>>> status = "disabled";
>>> };
>>>
>>> - usb@...00000 {
>>> - compatible = "ti,musb-am33xx";
>>> - reg = <0x47400000 0x1000 /* usbss */
>>> - 0x47401000 0x800 /* musb instance 0 */
>>> - 0x47401800 0x800>; /* musb instance 1 */
>>> - interrupts = <17 /* usbss */
>>> - 18 /* musb instance 0 */
>>> - 19>; /* musb instance 1 */
>>> - multipoint = <1>;
>>> - num-eps = <16>;
>>> - ram-bits = <12>;
>>> - port0-mode = <3>;
>>> - port1-mode = <3>;
>>> - power = <250>;
>>> - ti,hwmods = "usb_otg_hs";
>>> + phy1: am335x-usb0@...10620 {
>> Shouldn't the PHYs be *under* the usb0/1 device nodes in the hierarchy?
>> They're not on the same bus as the MUSB controllers for sure.
> I redo the complete thing. I have now:
> usb: usb@...00000 {
> compatible = "ti,am33xx-usb";
>
> usb0_phy: phy@...01300 {
> compatible = "ti,am335x-usb-phy";
> }
> usb0: usb@...01000 {
> musb0: usb@...01400 {
> compatible = "mg,musbmhdrc";
> }
> }
> usb1_phy: phy@...02300 {
> compatible = "ti,am335x-usb-phy";
> }
> usb1: usb@...02000 {
> musb1: usb@...02400 {
> compatible = "mg,musbmhdrc";
> }
> }
> }
> And you want usb0_phy to be child of usb0? In the TRM they are all in
> the same block.
Ah, the fact that PHYs didn't have the "reg" property got me muddled, I
didn't pay attention to the address part of the node names... BTW, where is
the "reg" prop? I see PHYs share the address space with
"omap-control-usb@...10620" device -- what's the point with this?
> Sebastian
WBR, Sergei
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists