linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 07/10] staging: ozwpan: Make oz_hcd_pd

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <520A70FC.6080003@cogentembedded.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 Aug 2013 21:46:36 +0400
From:	Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
To:	Rupesh Gujare <rupesh.gujare@...el.com>
CC:	devel@...uxdriverproject.org, dan.carpenter@...cle.com,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 07/10] staging: ozwpan: Make oz_hcd_pd_departed() take
 a struct pointer.

On 08/13/2013 09:40 PM, Rupesh Gujare wrote:

>>> oz_hcd_pd_departed() takes struct oz_port pointer instead of
>>> void *, change function declaration to avoid ambiguity.

>>> Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
>>> Signed-off-by: Rupesh Gujare <rupesh.gujare@...el.com>
>>> ---
>>>   drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozhcd.c |    4 ++--
>>>   drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozhcd.h |    2 +-
>>>   2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

>>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozhcd.c b/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozhcd.c
>>> index 73d80f2..ed3ffeb 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozhcd.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/staging/ozwpan/ozhcd.c
>>> @@ -720,9 +720,9 @@ out:
>>>    * polled. We release the reference we hold on the PD.
>>>    * Context: softirq
>>>    */
>>> -void oz_hcd_pd_departed(void *hport)
>>> +void oz_hcd_pd_departed(struct oz_port *hport)
>>>   {
>>> -    struct oz_port *port = (struct oz_port *)hport;
>>> +    struct oz_port *port = hport;

>>    Do you really need a copy? Isn't it better to rename the parameter and
>> remove this line altogether?

>> WBR, Sergei

> Yes, that is the idea,  for next patch series, as I don't want to mix two
> changes in single patch.

    Don't think it's worth another series.

WBR, Sergei

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/