[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9E3F9C2076C45D4783F09B90D5BE77CE18E667@BADWLRZ-SWMBX13.ads.mwn.de>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 10:33:31 +0000
From: "Morales, Alejandra" <alejandra.morales@....de>
To: Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: Doubts on IO requests in USB subsystem
2013/9/9 Oliver Neukum <oliver@...kum.org>
>
> Your prime suspect is the detection of medium change which was
> moved into the kernel in 3.2 or so. It can be disabled by sysfs.
> Generally the notion that a certain task originates a read or write
> on a block device is iffy. Read-ahead and shared data structures
> make it impossible to accurately tell.
>
> USB storage devices are notorious for setting the removable bit
> even if they have no removable medium.
>
Thanks for the answer Oliver. Unfortunately it doesn't seem to be the
medium change detection what is causing these requests, since the
removable bit is disabled and the polling period is set to -1:
morales@...zerodesk:~$ udevadm info --query all --path /sys/block/sdc/ --attribute-walk
looking at device '/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1a.7/usb1/1-3/1-3:1.0/host11/target11:0:0/11:0:0:0/block/sdc':
KERNEL=="sdc"
SUBSYSTEM=="block"
DRIVER==""
ATTR{range}=="16"
ATTR{ext_range}=="256"
ATTR{removable}=="0"
ATTR{ro}=="0"
ATTR{size}=="1953525168"
ATTR{alignment_offset}=="0"
ATTR{discard_alignment}=="0"
ATTR{capability}=="50"
ATTR{stat}==" 12805 1970 102691 23528 747334 2557 5999128 3340096 0 1963084 3362880"
ATTR{inflight}==" 0 0"
ATTR{events}==""
ATTR{events_async}==""
ATTR{events_poll_msecs}=="-1"
Regards
- Alejandra--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists