[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5236DEBF.7070003@ti.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 13:34:39 +0300
From: Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@...com>
To: <monstr@...str.eu>
CC: Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
<linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] video: xilinxfb: Simplify error path
On 16/09/13 13:33, Michal Simek wrote:
> On 09/16/2013 11:51 AM, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> On 12/09/13 08:54, Michal Simek wrote:
>>
>>> @@ -394,16 +382,12 @@ static int xilinxfb_release(struct device *dev)
>>> /* Turn off the display */
>>> xilinx_fb_out32(drvdata, REG_CTRL, 0);
>>>
>>> - /* Release the resources, as allocated based on interface */
>>> - if (drvdata->flags & BUS_ACCESS_FLAG)
>>> - devm_iounmap(dev, drvdata->regs);
>>> #ifdef CONFIG_PPC_DCR
>>> - else
>>> + /* Release the resources, as allocated based on interface */
>>> + if (!(drvdata->flags & BUS_ACCESS_FLAG))
>>> dcr_unmap(drvdata->dcr_host, drvdata->dcr_len);
>>> #endif
>>
>> I might be mistaken, and it's not strictly part of this series, but
>> shouldn't dcr_unmap be called somewhere else also, if the probe fails?
>
> yes. It should.
Do you want me to apply these patches as they are, or do you want to
improve the series to include the dcr_unmap fix?
Tomi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (902 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists