[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5253F3D6.5060403@ti.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2013 07:00:22 -0500
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To: BenoƮt Cousson <bcousson@...libre.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>, Felipe <balbi@...com>,
Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] ARM: OMAP3: Fix hardware detection for omap3630 when
booted with device tree
On 10/07/2013 07:05 PM, Sebastian Reichel wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 07, 2013 at 03:43:49PM -0500, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c
>> index 39c7838..4fe5b9c 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm/mach-omap2/board-generic.c
>> @@ -113,6 +113,7 @@ MACHINE_END
>> #ifdef CONFIG_ARCH_OMAP3
>> static const char *omap3_boards_compat[] __initdata = {
>> "ti,omap3",
>> + "ti,omap343x",
> ^^^^
> You used omap36xx everywhere, so I guess this should be
> "ti,omap34xx"?
3630 has at least two variants:
http://www.ti.com/product/omap3621
http://www.ti.com/product/omap3630
It got further spun off in 37xx family:
http://www.ti.com/product/dm3730 (DM3730 and DM3725)
3430 is no longer in production - but just had a single version (at
least what I can remember).
3530 variant of 3430 on the other hand has a few:
http://processors.wiki.ti.com/index.php/OMAP3_Overview
I am ok to change to ti,omap34xx if folks think that is the right
thing to do. Personally, I might prefer to handle 35xx family slightly
differently considering deltas.
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists