[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131016083545.GP10651@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2013 10:35:45 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, akpm@...uxfoundation.org,
rostedt@...dmis.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] net: ip4_datagram_connect: Use correct form of
statistics update
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 12:47:23PM -0500, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> ip4_datagram_connect is called with BH processing enabled. Therefore
> we cannot use IP_INC_STATS_BH but must use IP_INC_STATS which disables
> BH handling before incrementing the counter.
>
> The following trace is triggered without this patch:
>
> [ 9293.806634] __this_cpu_add operation in preemptible [00000000] code: ntpd/2150
You lost the BUG there; that really needs to be there:
- BUG makes people pay attention
- This was an actual BUG wasn't it?
Sure there can be false positives, but in all cases people should amend
the code. Sometimes with a comment explaining why the raw primitive
should be used; sometimes to fix an actual bug, but a patch needs to be
written. Therefore BUG!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists