[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131030224444.GA9092@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2013 15:44:44 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: WTF: driver-core-next contains recursive directory removal!
On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 03:38:58PM -0700, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>
> Greg what is going on? I just looked and Tejuns ill-conceived recursive
> directory deletion code has been merged into your driver-core-next tree.
>
> That code is semantically broken. I reviewed it and I gave the reasons
> why it was wrong. You came up to me and mentioned at LPC that you
> agreed with my reasons. And yet I just looked in driver-core-next and
> there the code is in all of it's broken glory.
Because I tested it out, and there were no such problems.
> Please pull out that crap it has no business ever going into a stable
> kernel.
Really? It seems to survive my testing here just fine.
> The short version is unless someone has drastically changed pci hotplug
> since last time I looked the code is dramatically wrong as pci hotplug
> removes directories in the wrong order remove the parent first.
That should still work here, and I'm pretty sure I tested it, but will
do so before I send it to Linus.
I don't think there's an issue here, otherwise both Tejun and I would
have found some issues during testing, same for all of the other
linux-next users for the past few weeks.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists