[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131101160802.GB8467@hmsreliant.think-freely.org>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 12:08:02 -0400
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Run checksumming in parallel accross multiple alu's
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 03:42:46PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 14:30 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> [...]
> > It
> > functions, but unfortunately the performance lost to the completely broken
> > branch prediction that this inflicts makes it a non starter:
> [...]
>
> Conditional branches are no good but conditional moves might be worth a shot.
>
> Ben.
>
How would you suggest replacing the jumps in this case? I agree it would be
faster here, but I'm not sure how I would implement an increment using a single
conditional move.
Neil
> --
> Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
> Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
> They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists