[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1383322612.1737.6.camel@bwh-desktop.uk.level5networks.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 16:16:52 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@...arflare.com>
To: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
CC: Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Eric Dumazet" <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: Run checksumming in parallel accross multiple alu's
On Fri, 2013-11-01 at 12:08 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 03:42:46PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-10-31 at 14:30 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
> > [...]
> > > It
> > > functions, but unfortunately the performance lost to the completely broken
> > > branch prediction that this inflicts makes it a non starter:
> > [...]
> >
> > Conditional branches are no good but conditional moves might be worth a shot.
> >
> > Ben.
> >
> How would you suggest replacing the jumps in this case? I agree it would be
> faster here, but I'm not sure how I would implement an increment using a single
> conditional move.
You can't, but it lets you use additional registers as carry flags.
Whether there are enough registers and enough parallelism to cancel out
the extra additions required, I don't know.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings, Staff Engineer, Solarflare
Not speaking for my employer; that's the marketing department's job.
They asked us to note that Solarflare product names are trademarked.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists