[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20131101161752.GB2442@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Fri, 1 Nov 2013 16:17:53 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: add PAGE_ALIGNED_DATA to linker script
On Fri, Nov 01, 2013 at 03:01:30PM +0000, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-10-11 at 08:18 -0400, Mark Salter wrote:
> > On Wed, 2013-10-09 at 11:14 +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> > > > @@ -110,6 +110,7 @@ SECTIONS
> > > > */
> > > > INIT_TASK_DATA(THREAD_SIZE)
> > > > NOSAVE_DATA
> > > > + PAGE_ALIGNED_DATA(PAGE_SIZE)
> > > > CACHELINE_ALIGNED_DATA(64)
> > > > READ_MOSTLY_DATA(64)
> > >
> > > Can we just replace this chunk with RW_DATA_SECTION(64, PAGE_SIZE,
> > > THREAD_SIZE) instead?
> > >
> >
> > I took a look at this. It can be done, but the RW_DATA_SECTION aligns
> > data to PAGE_SIZE where the existing alignment is THREAD_SIZE. So using
> > RW_DATA_SECTION would waste some space if using 64K pagesize.
> >
> > --Mark
>
> So where do we stand with this one?
I'd probably go for using the generic macro, but I don't have strong
preferences either way.
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists