lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5286215A.4020009@linux.com>
Date:	Fri, 15 Nov 2013 14:27:54 +0100
From:	Levente Kurusa <levex@...ux.com>
To:	Geyslan Gregório Bem <geyslan@...il.com>,
	Caizhiyong <caizhiyong@...ilicon.com>
CC:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Wanglin (Albert)" <albert.wanglin@...ilicon.com>,
	Levente Kurusa <ilevex.linux@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] regmap: Fix 'ret' would return an uninitialized value

2013-11-15 14:00 keltezéssel, Geyslan Gregório Bem írta:
> 2013/11/15 Caizhiyong <caizhiyong@...ilicon.com>:
>> From: Cai Zhiyong <caizhiyong@...wei.com>
>> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 19:26:14 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] regmap: Fix 'ret' would return an uninitialized value
>>
>> This patch give a warning when calling regmap_register_patch with
>> parameter num_regs <= 0.
>>
>> When the num_regs parameter is zero and krealloc doesn't fail,
>> then the code would return an uninitialized value. However,
>> calling this function with num_regs == 0, would be a waste as it
>> essentially does nothing.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Cai Zhiyong <caizhiyong@...wei.com>
> Reviewed-by: Geyslan G. Bem <geyslan@...il.com>
> 
> Seems a good approach.
> 

The patch doesn't apply. After manually applying this it
threw a compilation error:

drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c: In function ‘regmap_register_patch’:
drivers/base/regmap/regmap.c:2176:6: error: expected expression before ‘)’ token


Cai,
You have missed the second parameter of WARN_ONCE().
Please append what you'd prefer to have outputten once the condition evaluates to true.

-- 
Regards,
Levente Kurusa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ