[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1385438057.23855.36.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 03:54:17 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, azurIt <azurit@...ox.sk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.2 73/87] fs: buffer: move allocation failure loop into
the allocator
On Mon, 2013-11-25 at 10:13 -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> On Mon, Nov 25, 2013 at 01:44:29PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > 3.2.53-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> >
> > ------------------
> >
> > From: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
> >
> > commit 84235de394d9775bfaa7fa9762a59d91fef0c1fc upstream.
> >
> > Buffer allocation has a very crude indefinite loop around waking the
> > flusher threads and performing global NOFS direct reclaim because it can
> > not handle allocation failures.
>
> Please don't apply this, it's part of a bigger series and was only
> tagged as a reminder. I'll send the full series to stable when the
> current cgroup instabilities are ironed out, just to be sure these
> patches are not the problem.
OK, I'll drop this.
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Usenet is essentially a HUGE group of people passing notes in class.
- Rachel Kadel, `A Quick Guide to Newsgroup Etiquette'
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists