[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LSU.2.11.1402071300300.926@eggly.anvils>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 13:06:00 -0800 (PST)
From: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
cc: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Filipe Brandenburger <filbranden@...gle.com>,
Li Zefan <lizefan@...wei.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Greg Thelen <gthelen@...gle.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
Markus Blank-Burian <burian@...nster.de>,
Shawn Bohrer <shawn.bohrer@...il.com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cgroup: use an ordered workqueue for cgroup
destruction
On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 12:20:44PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
> > You don't return to this concern in the following mails of the thread:
> > did you later decide that it actually won't be a problem? I'll assume
> > so for the moment, since you took the patch, but please reassure me.
>
> I was just worrying about a different solution where we take
> css_offline invocation outside of cgroup_mutex and bumping up
> max_active. There's nothing to worry about your patch. Sorry about
> not being clear. :)
Thanks a lot for your detailed and admirably responsive explanations.
You were looking ahead, I see that now, and I'm gratefully reassured :)
Hugh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists