[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20140207210705.GB13604@jtriplet-mobl1>
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2014 13:07:05 -0800
From: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
Cc: Rashika Kheria <rashika.kheria@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] mm: Remove ifdef condition in include/linux/mm.h
On Fri, Feb 07, 2014 at 01:04:47PM -0800, David Rientjes wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Feb 2014, Rashika Kheria wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> > index 1cedd00..5f8348f 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> > @@ -1589,10 +1589,8 @@ static inline int __early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn)
> > #else
> > /* please see mm/page_alloc.c */
> > extern int __meminit early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn);
> > -#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID
> > /* there is a per-arch backend function. */
> > extern int __meminit __early_pfn_to_nid(unsigned long pfn);
> > -#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_ARCH_EARLY_PFN_TO_NID */
> > #endif
> >
> > extern void set_dma_reserve(unsigned long new_dma_reserve);
>
> Wouldn't it be better to just declare the __early_pfn_to_nid() in
> mm/page_alloc.c to be static?
Won't that break the ability to override that function in
architecture-specific code (as arch/ia64/mm/numa.c does)?
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists